March 22, 2007 -- Copper interconnect was introduced to the mainstream at 130nm because of its
significant advantages compared to aluminum, such as reduction in resistivity
and power consumption and resistance to electromigration. Together with its
advantages, copper interconnect also brought challenges to achieving high yield
due to effects such as dishing, dielectric erosion and thickness variations
caused by Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) during planarization.
To account for copper's side effects, physical design tools insert dummy
metal patterns, called metal fill, so that designs meet the required metal
density " as specified by foundries " to reduce the thickness variation.
However, at 65nm and below, meeting the density target does not always achieve
minimum metal thickness variation, as the copper topography is affected by
several layout and process parameters.
To adequately control thickness at advanced technology nodes, new techniques
are necessary to take into account not only the metal density but also the metal
thickness itself.
By Charles Chiang, Seiji Norimatsu and Mitsuhiro Tomita.
(Chiang is a Scientist in the Advanced Technology Group at Synopsys, Inc,. and
both Norimatsu and Tomitais are Researchers with STARC.)
This brief introduction has been excerpted from the original copyrighted article.
View the entire article on the EE Times EDA Designline website.
Read more about Synopsys, Inc. on SOCcentral.com |